{UTF-8} ******************************************************** .scirev8 ********************************************************~ "Path Dependence, Competition and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific \ Revolution," John Sterman & Jason Wittenberg. Organization Science Vol. 10 \ No. 3, 1999. Translated to Vensim by Tom Fiddaman, 2011. models.metasd.com | :MACRO: POS(INPUT) POS=MAX(INPUT,1e-010) ~ INPUT ~ | :END OF MACRO: :MACRO: CLIP(true,false,a,b) CLIP=IF THEN ELSE(a>=b,true,false) ~ true ~ | :END OF MACRO: ******************************************************** .000.Notes ********************************************************~ Notes Translation from DYNAMO was started with the Vensim dyn2ven utility, combining the scirev.dyn and scirev.def files from http://jsterman.scripts.mit.edu/On-Line_Publications.html#1999Path At the command line: "c:\program files\vensim\dyn2ven" -6 scirev.dyn scirev.def scirev.mdl A few manual changes were made subsequently to fix broken subscript expressions. A few units errors in the original were corrected. A few minor changes were made to eliminate division-by-zero issues with use of NOSNDP. These caused floating point errors in the initial translation. I believe that the issue is that division by zero occurs when NOSNDP (number of strongest non-dominant paradigms) falls to 0. In DYNAMO, these errors may have been tolerated by the compiler because they only occurred when the numerator was also 0, resulting in a 0/0 condition. If that is the case, then this version should be behaviorally faithful to the original. If not, there may be some other cause of the error. Changes of possible significance are indicated with !! in the comment \ field. | ******************************************************** .100.Params ********************************************************~ 100 PARAMETER VALUES | NP Number of Possible Paradigms= INITIAL( ELMCOUNT(PM)) ~ Dmnl ~ NUMBER OF POSSIBLE PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | LSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Launch=1234 ~ Dmnl [0,8000,1] ~ RANDOM NUMBER SEED FOR PARADIGM LAUNCH (DIMENSIONLESS) !! modified to lower range (inconsequential) | SSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Strength=12345 ~ Dmnl [0,80000,1] ~ RANDOM NUMBER SEED FOR PARADIGM STRENGTH (DIMENSIONLESS) !! modified to lower range (inconsequential) | ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n1]=0 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n2]=40 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n3]=281.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n4]=282.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n5]=291 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n6]=298.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n7]=308 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n8]=309.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n9]=318.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n10]=319 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n11]=319.5 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n12]=323.5 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n13]=340.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n14]=364.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n15]=369 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n16]=392 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n17]=453.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n18]=465.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n19]=520.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n20]=654.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n21]=837.5 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n22]=851.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n23]=995.75 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n24]=1318 ~~| ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[n25]=1500 ~ Year ~ FIXED TIME OF LAUNCH FOR PARADIGMS 1-25 (DIMENSIONLESS) !! units error corrected | ******************************************************** .200.Activation ********************************************************~ 200 PROBABILITY OF PARADIGM ACTIVATION | RND Random Number=RANDOM UNIFORM(0,1,LSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Launch) ~ Dmnl ~ RANDOM NUMBER (DIMENSIONLESS) !! distribution assumed 0-1 | PCNP Probability for Creating New Paradigm=PPCPS Probability of Creation from Solving\ *PPSD Dominant Practitioners in Puzzle Solving+PPCAR Probability of Creation from Anomaly Resolution\ *PARD Dominant Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution+PPCOA Probability of Creation from Other Activity\ *(PDP Practitioners in Dominant Paradigm-PPSD Dominant Practitioners in Puzzle Solving\ -PARD Dominant Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution) ~ fraction/Year ~ PROBABILITY OF CREATING NEW PARADIGM (FRACTION/YEAR) | PPCPS Probability of Creation from Solving=0 ~ fraction/(Year*Person) ~ PROBABILITY OF PARADIGM CREATION FROM PUZZLE SOLVING (FRACTION/PERSON-YEAR) | PPCAR Probability of Creation from Anomaly Resolution=0.001 ~ fraction/(Person*Year) ~ PROBABILITY OF PARADIGM CREATION FROM ANOMALY RESOLUTION \ (FRACTION/PERSON-YEAR) | PPCOA Probability of Creation from Other Activity=0.0002 ~ fraction/(Year*Person) ~ PROBABILITY OF PARADIGM CREATION FROM OTHER ACTIVITIES \ (FRACTION/PERSON-YEAR) | PA Probability of Activation=PCNP Probability for Creating New Paradigm*TIME STEP*DFPA Discount for Activation ~ fraction ~ PROBABILITY OF ACTIVATION (FRACTION/YEAR) !! units error corrected - this actually represents prob(activation) \ within current time step, rather than per unit time | DFPA Discount for Activation=0.2 ~ Dmnl ~ DISCOUNT FOR PROBABILITY OF ACTIVATION (DIMENSIONLESS) | ******************************************************** .200.Activation.Launch ********************************************************~ SET UP LOGIC FOR SEQUENTIALLY LAUNCHING PARADIGMS | N : (n2-n25) ~ Dmnl ~ ARRAY INDEX FOR PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | "N-1" : (n1-n24) -> N ~ Dmnl ~ Added to implement DYNAMO array FOR notation for N-1 | X Next Paradigm Launch Switch[PM]= INTEG ( CX Increment for Next Paradigm Switch[PM]/TIME STEP, Init X[PM]) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE NEXT PARADIGM TO BE LAUNCHED (DIMENSIONLESS) | Init X[N] = 0 ~~| Init X[n1] = 2 ~ Dmnl ~ !! Added for initialization | CX Increment for Next Paradigm Switch[n1]=0 ~~| CX Increment for Next Paradigm Switch[N]= SPA Switch for Probabilistic Activation*CLIP(0,CLIP(CLIP(1,0,X Next Paradigm Launch Switch\ ["N-1"],1),0,PA Probability of Activation,RND Random Number),X Next Paradigm Launch Switch\ [N],1) +(1-SPA Switch for Probabilistic Activation)*CLIP(0,CLIP(0,CLIP(CLIP(1,0,X Next Paradigm Launch Switch\ ["N-1"],1),0,CPTHRESH Confidence Threshold for Deterministic Paradigm Launch,CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm\ ),X Next Paradigm Launch Switch[N],1),SUM(SIAP Switch for Active Paradigms[PM!]),MNAP Maximum Nmber of Active Paradigms for Deterministic Launch\ ) ~ Dmnl ~ INCREMENTOR FOR SWITCH TO INDICATE NEXT PARADIGM TO BE LAUNCHED \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | PM : (n1-n25) ~ Dmnl ~ ARRAY INDEX FOR PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | PPSV Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]=PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Persons ~ ARRAY FOR PRACTITIONERS IN PUZZLE-SOLVING FOR DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | PPSD Dominant Practitioners in Puzzle Solving=SUM(PPSV Practitioners in Puzzle Solving\ [PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN PUZZLE-SOLVING FOR DOMINANT PARADIGM (PERSONS) | PARV Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM]=PAR Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[\ PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms[PM] ~ Persons ~ ARRAY FOR PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION FORDOMINANT PARADIGMS \ (PERSONS) | PARD Dominant Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution=SUM(PARV Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution\ [PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION FOR DOMINANT PARADIGM(PERSONS) | SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(TTPMAX Maximum Trust-TTP Total Trust\ [PM] = 0,1,0) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | TTP Total Trust[PM]=P Practitioners[PM]*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Persons ~ TOTAL TRUST IN PARADIGM (PERSONS) | SIAP Switch for Active Paradigms[PM]= IF THEN ELSE(P Practitioners[PM] >= MSPDL Minimum Size for Deterministic Launch,1,0) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE ACTIVE PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | MNAP Maximum Nmber of Active Paradigms for Deterministic Launch=1.1 ~ Dmnl ~ MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACTIVE PARADIGMS FOR DETERMINISTIC LAUNCH (DIMENSIONLESS) | SPA Switch for Probabilistic Activation=1 ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH FOR PROBABILISTIC ACTIVATION (DIMENSIONLESS) | CPTHRESH Confidence Threshold for Deterministic Paradigm Launch=0.7 ~ Dmnl ~ CONFIDENCE THRESHOLD FOR DETERMINISTIC PARADIGM ACTIVATION (DIMENSIONLESS) | MSPDL Minimum Size for Deterministic Launch=2 ~ Persons ~ MINIMUM SIZE OF PARADIGM FOR DETERMINISTIC LAUNCH (DIMENSIONLESS) !! units error corrected | SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM]= IF THEN ELSE(P Practitioners[PM] >= MSPA Minimum Strength for Activation ,(SARL Switch for Random Launch*IF THEN ELSE(X Next Paradigm Launch Switch[PM] >= 1,\ 1,0)+(1-SARL Switch for Random Launch)*TSAP Switch for Fixed Launch Times[PM]) ,0) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO ACTIVATE PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | MSPA Minimum Strength for Activation=0.01 ~ Persons ~ MINIMUM STRENGTH OF PARADIGM FOR ACTIVATION (PERSONS) | TSAP Switch for Fixed Launch Times[PM]=STEP(1,ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[PM]) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO ACTIVITATE PARADIGMS FOR FIXED LAUNCH TIMES (DIMENSIONLESS) | SARL Switch for Random Launch=1 ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO ACTIVATE RANDOM LAUNCH (DIMENSIONLESS) | TOA Time of Paradigm Activation[PM]= INTEG ( DTOA Increment in Activation Time[PM]/TIME STEP, 0) ~ Year ~ TIME OF PARADIGM ACTIVATION (YEARS) | DTOA Increment in Activation Time[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms\ [PM]-NPINP Practitioners in New Paradigm/TIME STEP = 0,Time,0) ~ Year ~ INCREMENTOR TO TIME OF ACTIVATION (YEARS) | ******************************************************** .300.Puzzles ********************************************************~ 300 PUZZLE SOLVING | HSP Historical Solved Puzzles[PM]= INTEG ( (SP Solved Puzzles[PM]-HSP Historical Solved Puzzles[PM])/TEHSP Time to Establish Historical Solved Puzzles\ , SP Solved Puzzles[PM]) ~ Puzzles ~ HISTORICAL SOLVED PUZZLES (PUZZLES) | SP Solved Puzzles[PM]= INTEG ( PSR Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]+ARESR Anomaly Resolution Rate[PM], ISP Initial Solved Puzzles[PM]) ~ Puzzles ~ INITIAL SOLVED PUZZLES FOR PARADIGMS AFTER # 1 | ISP Initial Solved Puzzles[N]= 1 ~~| ISP Initial Solved Puzzles[n1]=1985 ~ Puzzles ~ INITIAL SOLVED PUZZLES IN PARADIGM 1 (PUZZLES) | PSR Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]= (PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]/ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles[PM])*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm\ [PM] ~ Puzzles/Year ~ PUZZLE SOLVING RATE (PUZZLES/YEAR) | ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles[PM]= NDP Noral Difficulty of Puzzles*EXP(ED Elasticity of Difficulty wrt Solved Puzzles*LN\ (1+(SP Solved Puzzles[PM]/NSP Normal Solved Puzzles[PM]))) ~ Year*Person/Puzzle ~ AVERAGE DIFFICULTY OF PUZZLES (DIMENSIONLESS) !! units error corrected | NDP Noral Difficulty of Puzzles=2 ~ Year*Person/Puzzle ~ NORMAL DIFFICULTY OF PUZZLES (PERSON-YEARS/PUZZLE) | ED Elasticity of Difficulty wrt Solved Puzzles=1 ~ Dmnl ~ ELASTICITY OF PUZZLE DIFFICULTY WITH RESPECT TO SOLVED PUZZLES \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | NSPD Normal Solved Puzzles for Paradigm 1=400 ~ Puzzles ~ NORMAL SOLVED PUZZLES FOR PARADIGM 1 (PUZZLES) | NSP Normal Solved Puzzles[n1]=INITIAL(NSPD Normal Solved Puzzles for Paradigm 1) ~~| NSP Normal Solved Puzzles[N]=INITIAL((1-SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives)*MIN(NSPA Normal Solved Puzzles\ *EXP(VSAP Variance in Strength of Paradigms*RANDOM NORMAL(-6,6,0,1,SSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Strength\ ) ),MSAP Maximum Strength of Paradigms)+SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives*NSPA Normal Solved Puzzles\ ) ~ Puzzles ~ NORMAL SOLVED PUZZLES FOR PARADIGMS OTHER THAN #1 (PUZZLES) | NSPA Normal Solved Puzzles=400 ~ Puzzles ~ NORMAL SOLVED PUZZLES BEFORE FACTORS FOR PARADIGMS OTHER THAN #1 (PUZZLES) | SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives=1 ~ Dmnl [0,1,1] ~ SWITCH TO ACTIVATE IDENTICAL ALTERNATIVES (DIMENSIONLESS) | VSAP Variance in Strength of Paradigms=2.5 ~ Dmnl ~ ARIANCE IN STRENGTH OF ALTERNATIVE PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | MSAP Maximum Strength of Paradigms=800 ~ Puzzles ~ MAXIMUM STRENGTH OF ALTERNATIVE PARADIGMS (PUZZLES) | PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]= P Practitioners[PM]*FPPS Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM] ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN PUZZLE SOLVING (PERSONS) | FPPS Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]=DFPPS Desired Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving\ [PM]*EUPPS Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving[PM] ~ fraction ~ RACTION OF PRACTITIONERS IN PUZZLE SOLVING (FRACTION) | EUPPS Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving[PM]= TEUPPS Table for Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving(PUA Puzzles Under Attack[PM]/\ DPUA Desired Puzzles Under Attack[PM]) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF UNSOLVED PUZZLES ON PUZZLE SOLVING (DIMENSIONLESS) | TEUPPS Table for Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving(0,0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8,1,0,0.4,0.7,\ 0.9,0.97,1) ~ Dmnl ~ ABLE FOR EFFECT OF UNSOLVED PUZZLES ON PUZZLE SOLVING (DIMENSIONLESS) | PUA Puzzles Under Attack[PM]= INTEG ( "PIAR Puzzle Initiation & Abandonment Rate"[PM]-PSR Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]-ARECR Anomaly Recognition Rate\ [PM], DPUA Desired Puzzles Under Attack[PM]) ~ Puzzles ~ PUZZLES UNDER ATTACK (PUZZLES) | "PIAR Puzzle Initiation & Abandonment Rate"[PM]=(PSR Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]+ARECR Anomaly Recognition Rate\ [PM]+CPUA Correction for Puzzles Under Attack[PM])*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[\ PM] ~ Puzzles/Year ~ PUZZLE INITIATION AND ABANDONMENT RATE (PUZZLES/YEAR) | CPUA Correction for Puzzles Under Attack[PM]=(DPUA Desired Puzzles Under Attack[PM]-PUA Puzzles Under Attack\ [PM])/TAPUA Time to Adjust Puzzles Under Attack ~ Puzzles/Year ~ CORRECTION FOR PUZZLES UNDER ATTACK (PUZZLES/YEAR) | TAPUA Time to Adjust Puzzles Under Attack=1 ~ Year ~ TIME TO ADJUST PUZZLES UNDER ATTACK (YEARS) | DPUA Desired Puzzles Under Attack[PM]= MAX(NPP Normal Puzzles per Practitioner*P Practitioners[PM]*DFPPS Desired Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving\ [PM],1) ~ Puzzles ~ DESIRED PUZZLES UNDER ATTACK (PUZZLES) | NPP Normal Puzzles per Practitioner= 1 ~ Puzzles/Person ~ NORMAL PUZZLES PER PRACTITIONER (PUZZLES/PRACTITIONER) | DFPPS Desired Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]=FPPSR Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research\ [PM]-FPAR Fraction of Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM] ~ fraction ~ DESIRED FRACTION OF PRACTITIONERS IN PUZZLE SOLVING (FRACTION) | FPPSR Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research[PM]=TFPPSR Table for Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research\ ((CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]-(0))/(1-(0))) ~ fraction ~ FRACTION OF PRACTITIONERS IN PARADIGM SANCTIONED RESEARCH (FRACTION) | TFPPSR Table for Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research(0,0.2,0.4,\ 0.6,0.8,1,0,0.1,0.6,0.85,0.95,1) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR FRACTION OF PRACTITIONERS IN PARADIGM SANCTIONED RESEARCH \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | FPAR Fraction of Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM]=FPPSR Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research\ [PM]*WPEAR Willingness to Enter Anomaly Resolution*EAPAR Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution\ [PM] ~ fraction ~ FRACTION OF PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION (FRACTION) | WPEAR Willingness to Enter Anomaly Resolution=0.25 ~ fraction ~ WILLINGNESS OF PRACTITIONERS TO ENTER ANOMALY RESOLUTION (FRACTION) | EAPAR Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM]=TEAPAR Table for Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution\ ((RA Relative Anomalies[PM]-(0))/(4-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF ANOMALIES ON PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION (DIMENSIONLESS) | TEAPAR Table for Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution(0,0.125,0.25\ ,0.375,0.5,0.625,0.75,0.875,1,0,0.25,0.45,0.6,0.73,0.85,0.93,0.98,1) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF ANOMALIES ON PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | RA Relative Anomalies[PM]=A Anomalies[PM]/AA Acceptable Anomalies ~ Dmnl ~ RELATIVE ANOMALIES (DIMENSIONLESS) | AA Acceptable Anomalies= 10 ~ Puzzles ~ ACCEPTABLE ANOMALIES (PUZZLES) | A Anomalies[PM]= INTEG ( ARECR Anomaly Recognition Rate[PM]-ARESR Anomaly Resolution Rate[PM], IA Initial Anomalies[PM]) ~ Puzzles ~ ANOMALIES (PUZZLES) | IA Initial Anomalies[N]= 0 ~~| IA Initial Anomalies[n1]=2.75 ~ Puzzles ~ INITIAL ANOMALIES FOR PARADIGM 1 (PUZZLES) | ARESR Anomaly Resolution Rate[PM]= (PAR Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM]/ADA Average Difficulty of Anomalies[PM]\ )*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Puzzles/Year ~ ANOMALY RESOLUTION RATE (PUZZLES/YEAR) | PAR Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM]= P Practitioners[PM]*FPAR Fraction of Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution[PM] ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN ANOMALY RESOLUTION (PERSONS) | ADA Average Difficulty of Anomalies[PM]= RDA Relative Difficulty of Anomalies*POS(ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles[PM]) ~ Person*Year/Puzzle ~ AVERAGE DIFFICULT OF ANOMALIES (PERSON-YEARS/PUZZLE) | RDA Relative Difficulty of Anomalies=5 ~ Dmnl ~ RELATIVE DIFFICULTY OF ANOMALIES (DIMENSIONLESS) | ARECR Anomaly Recognition Rate[PM]= (EPSR Expected Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]*FPRA Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies\ [PM])*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Puzzles/Year ~ ANOMALY RECOGNITION RATE (PUZZLES/YEAR) | EPSR Expected Puzzle Solving Rate[PM]= PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving[PM]/POS(DPAR Difficulty of Puzzles for Anomaly Resolution\ [PM]) ~ Puzzles/Year ~ EXPECTED PUZZLE SOLVING RATE (PUZZLES/YEAR) | FPRA Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies[PM]= TFPRA Table for Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies((1.44*LN(ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles\ [PM]/POS(DPAR Difficulty of Puzzles for Anomaly Resolution[PM]))-(-2))/(2-(-2))) ~ fraction ~ RACTION OF PUZZLES RECOGNIZED AS ANOMALIES (FRACTION) | TFPRA Table for Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies(0,0.125,0.25,0.375,0.5,0.625\ ,0.75,0.875,1,0.01,0.02,0.04,0.2,0.5,0.8,0.96,0.98,0.99) ~ Dmnl ~ ABLE FOR FRACTION OF PUZZLES RECOGNIZED AS ANOMALIES (DIMENSIONLESS) | RSP Relative Solved Puzzles[PM]=SP Solved Puzzles[PM]/(HSP Historical Solved Puzzles[\ PM]*(1+EGSP Expected Growth in Solved Puzzles*TEHSP Time to Establish Historical Solved Puzzles\ )) ~ Dmnl ~ RELATIVE SOLVED PUZZLES (DIMENSIONLESS) | TEHSP Time to Establish Historical Solved Puzzles=10 ~ Year ~ TIME TO ESTABLISH HISTORICAL SOLVED PUZZLES (YEARS) | EGSP Expected Growth in Solved Puzzles=0.02 ~ fraction/Year ~ EXPECTED GROWTH IN SOLVED PUZZLES (FRACTION/YEAR) | ASNDV Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM]=A Anomalies[PM]*SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Puzzles ~ ARRAY FOR ANOMALIES FROM STRONGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PUZZLES) | SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(P Practitioners[PM]\ -PNDMAX Practitioners in Largest Nondominant Paradigm = 0,1,0) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE STRONGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | ASND Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm= IF THEN ELSE( NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms>0 :AND: SUM ASNDV/NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms\ >= 0.0001 ,SUM ASNDV/NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms ,0.0001) ~ Puzzles ~ ANOMALIES FOR STRONGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) !! units error corrected; "NOSNDP>0 :AND:" added to avoid div/0 condition | SUM ASNDV = SUM(ASNDV Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM!]) ~ Puzzles ~ !! added for debugging ASND; eliminates redundant SUM | NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms=SUM(SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms\ [PM!]) ~ Dmnl ~ NUMBER OF STRONGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | SPSNDV Solved Puzzles from Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM]=SP Solved Puzzles[PM]*\ SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM] ~ Puzzles ~ ARRAY FOR SOLVED PUZZLES FROM STRONGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PUZZLES) | SPSND Solved Puzzles for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm= IF THEN ELSE(NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms>0 :AND: SUM(SPSNDV Solved Puzzles from Strongest Nondominant Paradigms\ [PM!])/NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms >=0.0001 ,SUM(SPSNDV Solved Puzzles from Strongest Nondominant Paradigms[PM!])/NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms ,0.0001) ~ Puzzles ~ SOLVED PUZZLES FOR STRONGEST ND PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) !! units error corrected; "NOSNDP>0 :AND:" added to avoid div/0 condition | SPDV Solved Puzzles in Paradigms[PM]=SP Solved Puzzles[PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Puzzles ~ ARRAY HOLDING SOLVED PUZZLES IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (PUZZLES) | SPD Solved Puzzles in Dominant Paradigm=SUM(SPDV Solved Puzzles in Paradigms[PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Puzzles ~ NUMBER OF SOLVED PUZZLES IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (PUZZLES) | SPRDP Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]=SP Solved Puzzles[PM]/POS(DFSP Discount for Solved Puzzles\ *SPD Solved Puzzles in Dominant Paradigm) ~ Dmnl ~ SOLVED PUZZLES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | DFSP Discount for Solved Puzzles=1 ~ Dmnl ~ DISCOUNT FOR SOLVED PUZZLES (DIMENSIONLESS) | ADV Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm[PM]=A Anomalies[PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Puzzles ~ ARRAY HOLDING ANOMALIES IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (PUZZLES) | AD Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm= SUM(ADV Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm[PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Puzzles ~ NUMBER OF ANOMALIES IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (PUZZLES) | ARDP Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]=A Anomalies[PM]/POS(DFA Discount for Anomalies\ *AD Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm) ~ Dmnl ~ ANOMALIES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | DFA Discount for Anomalies=1 ~ Dmnl ~ DISCOUNT FOR ANOMALIES (DIMENSIONLESS) | ******************************************************** .400.CONFIDENCE ********************************************************~ 400 CONFIDENCE | DPAR Difficulty of Puzzles for Anomaly Resolution[PM]=NDPAR Normal Difficulty for Anomaly Resolution\ *ECART Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution[PM] ~ Year*Person/Puzzle ~ DIFFICULTY OF PUZZLES FOR ANOMALY RESOLUTION (PERSON-YEARS/PUZZLE) | NDPAR Normal Difficulty for Anomaly Resolution=4 ~ Year*Person/Puzzle ~ NORMAL DIFFICULTY OF PUZZLES FOR ANOMALY RESOLUTION (PERSON-YEARS/PUZZLE) | ECART Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution[PM]=TECART Table for Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution\ ((CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]-(0))/(1-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE ON ANOMALY RECOGNITION TIME (DIMENSIONLESS) | TECART Table for Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution(0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6\ ,0.7,0.8,0.9,1,0,0.01,0.1,0.3,0.6,1,1.4,1.9,2.6,4.5,10 ) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE ON ANOMALY RECOGNITION TIME (DIMENSIONLESS) | CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]= INTEG ( CC Change in Confidence[PM], ICPN Initial Confidence in Paradigm 1[PM]) ~ Confidence Units ~ INITIAL CONFIDENCE IN PARADIGM IN NORMAL SCIENCE (CONFIDENCE UNITS) | ICPN Initial Confidence in Paradigm 1[N]= INITIAL( ICPE Initial Confidence in Emerging Paradigm) ~~| ICPN Initial Confidence in Paradigm 1[n1]=0.96 ~ Confidence Units ~ VALUE OF CONFIDENCE IN PARADIGM 1 (CONFIDENCE UNITS) | ICPE Initial Confidence in Emerging Paradigm= 0.5 ~ Confidence Units ~ INITIAL CONFIDENCE IN PARADIGM IN EMERGENCE PHASE (CONFIDENCE UNITS) | CC Change in Confidence[PM]= (NCC Normal Change in Confidence*ICC Indicated Change in Confidence[PM]*RCC Receptiveness to Change in Confidence\ [PM])*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Confidence Units/Year ~ CHANGE IN CONFIDENCE (CONFIDENCE UNITS/YEAR) | NCC Normal Change in Confidence= 0.003 ~ Confidence Units/Year ~ NORMAL CHANGE IN CONFIDENCE (CONFIDENCE UNITS/YEAR) | RCC Receptiveness to Change in Confidence[PM]= TRCC Table for Receptiveness to Change in Confidence((CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]-\ (0))/(1-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ RECEPTIVENESS TO CHANGE IN CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | TRCC Table for Receptiveness to Change in Confidence( 0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1,0,0.3,0.6,0.8,0.95,1,0.95,0.8,0.6,0.3,0) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR RECEPTIVENESS TO CHANGE IN CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | ICC Indicated Change in Confidence[PM]=CA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Expectations\ *EAC Effect of Anomalies on Confidence[PM]+CSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Expectations\ *EPC Effect of Progress on Confidence[PM]+CDA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Dominant\ *EARDPC Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant[PM]+CDSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant\ *ESPRDPC Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]+CRAAP Constant for Anomalies Across Paradigms\ *ERAAPC Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms[PM]*SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms [PM]+CRSPAP Constatnt for Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms*ERSPAPC Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms\ [PM]*SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms[PM] ~ Dmnl ~ INDICATED CHANGE IN CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | CA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Expectations=1 ~ Dmnl ~ CONSTANT FOR ANOMALIES RELATIVE TO EXPECTATIONS (DIMENSIONLESS) | CSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Expectations=1 ~ Dmnl ~ CONST FOR SOLVD PUZZLES RELATIVE TO EXPECTATIONS (DIMENSIONLESS) | CDA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Dominant=1 ~ Dmnl ~ CONSTANT FOR ANOMALIES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | CDSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant=1.5 ~ Dmnl ~ CONSTANT FOR SOLVED PUZZLES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | CRAAP Constant for Anomalies Across Paradigms=1 ~ Dmnl ~ CONSTANT FOR RELATIVE ANOMALIES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | CRSPAP Constatnt for Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms=1.25 ~ Dmnl ~ CONSTANT FOR RELATIVE SP ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(SIHDP Switch for Historically Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] >= 1,0,1)*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE PARADIGMS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN DOMINANT (DIMENSIONLESS) | SIHDP Switch for Historically Dominant Paradigms[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(HDP Historically Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] >= 1,1,0) ~ Dmnl ~ SWITCH TO INDICATE HISTORICALLY DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | HDP Historically Dominant Paradigms[PM]= INTEG ( CHDP Increment to Historically Dominant Paradigms[PM]/TIME STEP, 0) ~ Dmnl ~ ARRAY TO INDICATE HISTORICALLY DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | CHDP Increment to Historically Dominant Paradigms[PM]= SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms[PM] ~ Dmnl ~ INCREMENTOR TO ARRAY INDICATING HISTORICALLY DOMINANT PARADIGMS \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | EAC Effect of Anomalies on Confidence[PM]=TEAC Table for Effect of Anomalies on Confidence\ ((RA Relative Anomalies[PM]-(0))/(6-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF ANOMALIES ON CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | TEAC Table for Effect of Anomalies on Confidence(0,0.0833333,0.166667,0.25,0.333333,0.416667\ ,0.5,0.583333,0.666667,0.75,0.833333, 0.916667,1,5,2.15,0,-1.2,-2.15,-2.9,-3.4,-3.9,-4.4,-4.8,-5.1,-5.3,-5.4) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF ANOMALIES ON CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | EPC Effect of Progress on Confidence[PM]=TEPC Table for Effect of Confidence on Progress\ ((RSP Relative Solved Puzzles[PM]-(0))/(5-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF PROGRESS ON CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | TEPC Table for Effect of Confidence on Progress(0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9\ ,1,-5,-2.15,0,1.2,2.15,2.9,3.4,3.9,4.2, 4.4,4.5) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF PROGRESS ON CONFIDENCE (DIMENSIONLESS) | EARDPC Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant[PM]=TARDPC Table for Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm\ ((ARDP Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]-(0))/(6-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF ANOMALIES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | TARDPC Table for Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm(0,0.0833333,0.166667\ ,0.25,0.333333,0.416667,0.5,0.583333,0.666667,0.75,0.833333, 0.916667,1,5,2.15,0,-1.2,-2.15,-2.9,-3.4,-3.9,-4.4,-4.8,-5.1,-5.4,-5.7) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF ANOMALIES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | ESPRDPC Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]=TSPRDPC Table for Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm\ ((SPRDP Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm[PM]-(0))/(5-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF SOLVED PUZZLES RELATIVE TO DOMINANT PARADIGM (DIMENSIONLESS) | TSPRDPC Table for Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm(0,0.1,0.2,0.3\ ,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1,-5,-2.15,0,1.2,2.15,2.9,3.4,3.9,4.2 ,4.4,4.5) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF SOLVED PUZZLES REALTIVE TO THE DOMINANT PARADIGM \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | RAAP Relative Anomalies Across Paradigms[PM]=A Anomalies[PM]/ASND Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm ~ Dmnl ~ RELATIVE ANOMALIES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | ERAAPC Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms[PM]= TRAAPC Table for Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms(RAAP Relative Anomalies Across Paradigms\ [PM]/2) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF RELATIVE ANOMALIES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | TRAAPC Table for Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms(0,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.2,0.25\ ,0.3,0.35,0.4,0.45,0.5,0.55,0.6,0.65,0.7,0.75,0.8, 0.85,0.9,0.95,1,3.8,3.6,3.4,3.2,3,2.8,2.6,2.4,2.2,2,0,-2,-2.2,-2.4,-2.6,-2.8 ,-3,-3.2,-3.4,-3.6,-3.8) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF RELATIVE ANOMALIES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | RSPAP Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms[PM]=SP Solved Puzzles[PM]/SPSND Solved Puzzles for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm ~ Dmnl ~ RELATIVE SOLVED PUZZLES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | ERSPAPC Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms[PM]=TRSPAPC Table for Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms\ ((RSPAP Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms[PM]-(0))/(2-(0))) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF RELATIVE SOLVED PUZZLES ACROSS PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | TRSPAPC Table for Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms(0,0.05,0.1,0.15,\ 0.2,0.25,0.3,0.35,0.4,0.45,0.5,0.55,0.6,0.65,0.7,0.75,0.8, 0.85,0.9,0.95,1,-3.8,-3.6,-3.4,-3.2,-3,-2.8,-2.6,-2.4,-2.2,-2,0,2,2.2,2.4,2.6 ,2.8,3,3.2,3.4,3.6,3.8) ~ Dmnl ~ TABLE FOR EFFECT OF RELATIVE SOLVED PUZZLES ACROSS PARADIGMS \ (DIMENSIONLESS) | ******************************************************** .500.PRACTITIONERS ********************************************************~ 500 PRACTITIONERS | FPCP Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm[PM]=P Practitioners[PM]/TP Total Practitioners ~ fraction ~ FRACTION OF PRACTITIONERS COMMITTED TO THE PARADIGM (FRACTION) | TP Total Practitioners=500 ~ Persons ~ TOTAL PRACTITIONERS (PERSONS) | P Practitioners[PM]= INTEG ( RR Recruitment Rate[PM]-DR Defection Rate[PM]-DINP Defection to New Paradigms[PM], P Initial Practitioners[PM]) ~ Persons ~ IN NORMAL SCIENCE ALL PRACTITIONERS ARE IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (PERSONS) | P Initial Practitioners[N]= 0 ~~| P Initial Practitioners[n1]=TP Total Practitioners ~ Persons ~ !! added for initialization | PDPV Dominant Practitioners[PM]=P Practitioners[PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Persons ~ ARRAY FOR PRACTITIONERS IN DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | PDP Practitioners in Dominant Paradigm=SUM(PDPV Dominant Practitioners[PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | RR Recruitment Rate[PM]= TDR Total Defection Rate*FDRP Fraction of Departures Recruited[PM]*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm\ [PM]+RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms[PM] ~ Persons/Year ~ RECRUITMENT RATE (PERSONS/YEAR) | RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms[PM]= (1-SARL Switch for Random Launch)*RINPF[PM]+SARL Switch for Random Launch*RINPNF[PM] ~ Persons/Year ~ RECRUITMENT INTO NEW PARADIGMS (PERSONS/YEAR) | RINPNF[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(CX Increment for Next Paradigm Switch[PM] >= 1,NPINP Practitioners in New Paradigm\ /TIME STEP,0) ~ Persons/Year ~ RECRUITMENT INTO NEW PARADIGMS FOR NON-FIXED LAUNCH TIMES (PERSONS/YEAR) | RINPF[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(Time-ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times[PM] = 0,NPINP Practitioners in New Paradigm\ /TIME STEP,0) ~ Persons/Year ~ RECRUITMENT INTO NEW PARADIGMS FOR FIXED LAUNCH TIMES (PERSONS/YEAR) | NPINP Practitioners in New Paradigm=5 ~ Persons ~ NUMBER OF PRACTITIONERS IN NEW PARADIGM (PERSONS) | TDR Total Defection Rate= SUM(DR Defection Rate[PM!]) ~ Persons/Year ~ TOTAL DEFECTION RATE (PERSONS/YEAR) | FDRP Fraction of Departures Recruited[PM]= AP Attractiveness of Paradigm[PM]/TAP Total Attractiveness of Paradigms ~ fraction ~ FRACTION OF DEPARTURES RECRUITED TO A PARADIGM (FRACTION) | TAP Total Attractiveness of Paradigms=SUM(AP Attractiveness of Paradigm[PM!]) ~ Persons ~ TOTAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF ALL PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | AP Attractiveness of Paradigm[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(P Practitioners[PM] >= 1,P Practitioners\ [PM],0)*(NFDR Normal Fractional Defection Rate/ANFDR Fraction Normally Defecting)*ECAR Effect of Confidence on Attractiveness\ [PM] ~ Persons ~ ATTRACTIVENESS OF PARADIGM (PERSONS) | ECAR Effect of Confidence on Attractiveness[PM]=ECR Effect of Confidence on Recruitment\ [PM] ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE ON ATTRACTIVENESS (DIMENSIONLESS) | ANFDR Fraction Normally Defecting=SUM(NDR Normal Defection Rate[PM!])/TP Total Practitioners ~ fraction/Year ~ FRACTION OF ALL PRACTITIONERS WHO NORMALLY DEFECT (FRACTION) !! units error? | ECR Effect of Confidence on Recruitment[PM]=EXP(SRC Sensitivity of Recruitment to Confidence\ *(CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]-CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm)) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE ON RECRUITMENT (DIMENSIONLESS) | SRC Sensitivity of Recruitment to Confidence=5 ~ 1/Confidence Units ~ SENSITIVITY OF RECRUITMENT TO CONFIDENCE (1/CONFIDENCE UNITS) | CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm=SUM(CDPV Confidence in Dominent Paradigms[PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms ~ Confidence Units ~ CONFIDENCE IN THE DOMINANT PARADIGM (CONFIDENCE UNITS) | CDPV Confidence in Dominent Paradigms[PM]=CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]*SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Confidence Units ~ ARRAY HOLDING CONFIDENCE IN DOMINANT PARADIGM (CONFIDENCE UNITS) | DR Defection Rate[PM]= (MIN(MAXDR Maximum Departure Rate[PM],NDR Normal Defection Rate[PM]*ECD Effect of Confidence on Defection\ [PM])+P Practitioners[PM]*NRETR Normal Retirement Rate)*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm\ [PM] ~ Persons/Year ~ DEFECTION RATE (PERSONS/YEAR) | MAXDR Maximum Departure Rate[PM]=MAXFDR Max Fractional Departure Rate*P Practitioners\ [PM] ~ Persons/Year ~ MAXIMUM DEPARTURE RATE [EXCLUSIVE OF RETIREMENT] (PEOPLE/YEAR) | MAXFDR Max Fractional Departure Rate=0.1 ~ 1/Year ~ MAXIMUM FRACTIONAL DEPARTURE RATE (1/YEAR) | NRETR Normal Retirement Rate=0.025 ~ 1/Year ~ NORMAL RETIREMENT RATE (PERSONS/YEAR) !! units error corrected | NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms=IF THEN ELSE(SUM(SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms\ [PM!]) >= 1,SUM(SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms[PM!]),1) ~ Dmnl ~ NUMBER OF DOMINANT PARADIGMS (DIMENSIONLESS) | DINP Defection to New Paradigms[PM]= IF THEN ELSE(TTPMAX Maximum Trust-TTP Total Trust[PM] = 0,SUM(RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms\ [PM!])/NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,0) ~ Persons/Year ~ EFECTION INTO NEW PARADIGMS (PERSONS/YEAR) | NDR Normal Defection Rate[PM]=NFDR Normal Fractional Defection Rate*P Practitioners[PM\ ] ~ Persons/Year ~ NORMAL DEFECTION RATE (PERSONS/YEAR) | NFDR Normal Fractional Defection Rate=0.04 ~ fraction/Year ~ NORMAL FRACTIONAL DEFECTION RATE (FRACTION/YEAR) | ECD Effect of Confidence on Defection[PM]=EXP(-SDC Sensitivity of Defection to Confidence\ *(CP Confidence in Paradigm[PM]-CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm)) ~ Dmnl ~ EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE ON DEFECTION (DIMENSIONLESS) | SDC Sensitivity of Defection to Confidence=5 ~ 1/Confidence Units ~ SENSITIVITY OF DEFECTION TO CONFIDENCE (1/CONFIDENCE UNITS) | PND Practitioners in Nondominant Paradigm[PM]=P Practitioners[PM]*SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms\ [PM] ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | PNDMAX Practitioners in Largest Nondominant Paradigm=VMAX(PND Practitioners in Nondominant Paradigm\ [PM!]) ~ Persons ~ PRACTITIONERS IN LARGEST NON-DOMINANT PARADIGM (PERSONS) | TTPMAX Maximum Trust=VMAX(TTP Total Trust[PM!]) ~ Persons ~ MAXIMUM VALUE OF TRUST IN PARADIGM (PERSONS) | TTPA[PM]=IF THEN ELSE(TTP Total Trust[PM]-TTPMAX Maximum Trust = 0,0,TTP Total Trust[\ PM])*SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm[PM] ~ Persons ~ TRUST IN PARADIGM FOR NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | TTPAMAX=VMAX(TTPA[PM!]) ~ Persons ~ MAXIMUM TRUST IN A PARADIGM FOR NON-DOMINANT PARADIGMS (PERSONS) | ******************************************************** .500.PRACTITIONERS.CROSS-PARADIGM COMPARISONS ********************************************************~ CROSS-PARADIGM COMPARISONS | CE Cumulative Effort[PM]= INTEG ( DCE Change in Cumulative Effort[PM], 0) ~ Persons ~ CUMULATIVE EFFORT (PERSONS) [NOT CURRENTLY USED] ~ :SUPPLEMENTARY | DCE Change in Cumulative Effort[PM]=P Practitioners[PM] ~ Persons/Year ~ RATE OF CHANGE OF CUMULATIVE EFFORT (PERSONS/YEAR) | ******************************************************** .999.CONTROL DATA ********************************************************~ CONTROL DATA | SAVEPER = TIME STEP ~ Year ~ | TIME STEP = 0.25 ~ Year ~ SOLUTION INTERVAL (YEARS) | FINAL TIME = 2000 ~ Year ~ LENGTH OF SIMULATION (YEARS) | INITIAL TIME = 0 ~ Year ~ !! Assumed with FINAL_TIME = LENGTH | \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *About $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,100,0 12,1,0,170,120,118,38,8,7,0,24,-1,0,0,0,-1--1--1,0-0-0,|12|B|0-0-0 Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the Dynamics of Scientific Revolution 12,2,0,170,245,77,24,8,7,0,0,-1,0,0,0 ORGANIZATION SCIENCE/Vol. 10, No. 3, May–June 1999 12,3,0,174,191,54,16,8,7,0,0,-1,0,0,0 John Sterman & Jason Wittenberg 12,4,0,170,355,74,24,8,7,0,0,-1,0,0,0 Translated to Vensim by Tom Fiddaman, 2011, updated 2018 12,5,0,170,400,65,14,8,135,0,18,-1,0,253,253,-1--1--1,0-0-0,|10|U|0-0-255 http://models.metasd.com|models.metasd.com 12,6,0,170,305,131,24,8,135,0,18,-1,0,253,253,-1--1--1,0-0-0,|10|U|0-0-255 http://jsterman.scripts.mit.edu/On-Line_Publications.html#1999Path|http://jsterman.scripts.mit.edu/On-Line_Publications.html#1999Path 12,7,0,572,225,189,25,8,135,0,0,-1,0,0,0 See also notes in text view, especially concerning division by zero errors with NOSNDP. 12,8,0,563,107,207,27,8,135,0,2,-1,0,0,0,-1--1--1,0-0-0,|10||255-0-0 This version appears to be behaviorally faithful to the original in DYNAMO, but should be regarded as BETA SOFTWARE. 12,9,0,559,163,165,14,8,135,0,0,-1,0,0,0 Improvements can be sent to tom@metasd.com. 12,10,0,445,328,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,11,0,549,370,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,12,0,660,320,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,13,0,649,449,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,14,0,510,474,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *Practitioners $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,5,0 10,1,P Practitioners,612,201,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,2,P Initial Practitioners,608,127,43,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,3,2,1,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(608,155)| 12,4,48,381,205,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,5,7,1,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(528,201)| 1,6,7,4,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(432,201)| 11,7,48,479,201,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,8,RR Recruitment Rate,479,225,49,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 12,9,48,822,203,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,10,17,9,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(775,203)| 1,11,17,1,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(689,203)| 12,12,48,589,359,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,13,15,12,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(589,321)| 1,14,15,1,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(589,250)| 11,15,48,589,285,8,6,33,3,0,0,4,0,0,0 10,16,DINP Defection to New Paradigms,652,285,55,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 11,17,3228,732,203,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,18,DR Defection Rate,732,220,56,9,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,19,FDRP Fraction of Departures Recruited,325,289,65,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,20,19,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(395,259)| 1,21,28,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(540,328)| 10,22,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,349,117,60,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,23,22,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(408,166)| 10,24,TDR Total Defection Rate,603,75,45,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,25,24,7,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(520,127)| 10,26,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,656,464,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,27,26,16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(654,381)| 10,28,RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms,596,422,70,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,29,28,16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(621,358)| 10,30,TTP Total Trust,776,432,46,9,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,31,30,16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(721,367)| 10,32,TTPMAX Maximum Trust,698,375,48,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,33,32,16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(678,336)| 10,34,ECD Effect of Confidence on Defection,893,223,44,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,35,34,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(825,222)| 10,36,MAXDR Maximum Departure Rate,853,272,56,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,37,36,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(790,245)| 10,38,NDR Normal Defection Rate,853,382,45,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,39,38,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(794,303)| 10,40,NRETR Normal Retirement Rate,854,328,50,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,41,40,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(794,275)| 1,42,1,18,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(673,241)| 10,43,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,840,112,64,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,44,43,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(785,166)| 1,45,18,24,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(699,138)| 10,46,CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm,1022,276,60,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,47,46,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(966,253)| 10,48,CP Confidence in Paradigm,1029,232,57,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,49,48,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(961,227)| 10,50,SDC Sensitivity of Defection to Confidence,1018,163,72,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,51,50,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(967,187)| 10,52,MAXFDR Max Fractional Departure Rate,991,326,62,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,53,52,36,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(918,297)| 1,54,1,36,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(718,231)| 10,55,CDPV Confidence in Dominent Paradigms,1164,272,64,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,56,55,46,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1097,273)| 10,57,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,1139,313,64,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,58,57,46,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1087,296)| 1,59,62,57,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1230,301)| 10,60,CP Confidence in Paradigm,1220,221,57,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,61,60,55,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1197,241)| 10,62,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,1313,293,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,63,62,55,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1243,283)| 10,64,NFDR Normal Fractional Defection Rate,861,570,61,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,65,64,38,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(856,479)| 1,66,1,38,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(728,289)| 1,67,30,32,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(747,411)| 1,68,1,30,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(693,316)| 10,69,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,786,485,60,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,70,69,30,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(781,461)| 10,71,AP Attractiveness of Paradigm,352,412,55,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,72,71,19,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(340,357)| 10,73,TAP Total Attractiveness of Paradigms,227,360,51,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,74,73,19,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(275,324)| 1,75,71,73,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(302,391)| 10,76,ANFDR Fraction Normally Defecting,404,479,58,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,77,76,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(382,450)| 10,78,ECAR Effect of Confidence on Attractiveness,292,474,46,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,79,78,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(320,444)| 1,80,64,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(608,492)| 1,81,1,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(484,304)| 10,82,ECR Effect of Confidence on Recruitment,271,544,44,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,83,82,78,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(279,515)| 10,84,CP Confidence in Paradigm,229,616,57,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,85,84,82,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(243,590)| 10,86,SRC Sensitivity of Recruitment to Confidence,344,622,55,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,87,86,82,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(312,588)| 10,88,TP Total Practitioners,395,543,39,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,89,88,76,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(398,517)| 10,90,CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm,466,589,65,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,91,NDR Normal Defection Rate,504,528,49,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,92,91,76,0,0,0,0,0,128,0,-1--1--1,,1|(460,507)| 1,93,90,82,0,0,0,0,0,128,0,-1--1--1,,1|(364,565)| 12,94,0,987,431,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,95,0,1091,473,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,96,0,1202,423,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,97,0,1191,552,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,98,0,1052,577,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *Confidence $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,5,0 10,1,CP Confidence in Paradigm,1127,118,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 12,2,48,790,122,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,3,5,1,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1015,121)| 1,4,5,2,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(866,121)| 11,5,48,938,121,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,6,CC Change in Confidence,938,151,43,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,7,ICC Indicated Change in Confidence,722,194,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,8,7,6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(835,171)| 10,9,NCC Normal Change in Confidence,868,236,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,10,9,6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(898,198)| 10,11,RCC Receptiveness to Change in Confidence,1038,236,69,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,12,11,6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(993,197)| 10,13,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,914,46,64,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,14,13,5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(925,83)| 10,15,ICPN Initial Confidence in Paradigm 1,1129,42,42,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,16,15,1,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1128,75)| 1,17,1,11,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1085,173)| 10,18,TRCC Table for Receptiveness to Change in Confidence,1032,325,78,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,19,18,11,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1034,283)| 10,20,CA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Expectations,573,118,66,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,21,20,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(648,156)| 10,22,CDA Constant for Anomalies Relative to Dominant,387,148,66,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,23,22,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(547,169)| 10,24,CDSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant,351,208,73,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,25,24,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(532,201)| 10,26,CRAAP Constant for Anomalies Across Paradigms,525,276,63,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,27,26,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(626,233)| 10,28,CRSPAP Constatnt for Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms,369,261,71,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,29,28,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(540,228)| 10,30,CSP Constant for Solved Puzzles Relative to Expectations,544,330,75,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,31,30,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(632,262)| 10,32,EAC Effect of Anomalies on Confidence,862,322,42,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,33,32,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(792,258)| 10,34,EARDPC Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant,588,385,66,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,35,34,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(652,291)| 10,36,EPC Effect of Progress on Confidence,780,372,42,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,37,36,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(752,285)| 10,38,ERAAPC Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms,578,454,78,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,39,38,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(648,326)| 10,40,ERSPAPC Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms,917,461,73,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,41,40,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(820,329)| 10,42,ESPRDPC Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm,634,570,82,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,43,42,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(676,385)| 10,44,SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms,732,515,77,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,45,44,7,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(727,357)| 10,46,ARDP Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm,425,391,63,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,47,46,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(498,388)| 10,48,TARDPC Table for Effect of Anomalies Relative to Dominant Paradigm,408,465,82,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,49,48,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(491,427)| 10,50,RAAP Relative Anomalies Across Paradigms,460,533,56,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,51,50,38,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(512,497)| 10,52,TRAAPC Table for Effect of Relative Anomalies Aross Paradigms,560,518,82,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,53,52,38,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(566,492)| 10,54,SPRDP Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm,682,694,73,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,55,54,42,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(660,638)| 10,56,TSPRDPC Table for Effect of Solved Puzzles Relative to Dominant Paradigm,572,645,87,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,57,56,42,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(597,612)| 10,58,RA Relative Anomalies,934,415,40,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,59,58,32,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(905,377)| 10,60,TEAC Table for Effect of Anomalies on Confidence,1012,378,78,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,61,60,32,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(943,351)| 10,62,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,836,642,60,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,63,62,44,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(791,587)| 10,64,SIHDP Switch for Historically Dominant Paradigms,789,684,65,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,65,64,44,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(762,606)| 10,66,HDP Historically Dominant Paradigms,810,748,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,67,66,64,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(802,726)| 10,68,RSPAP Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms,1077,521,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,69,68,40,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1003,493)| 10,70,TRSPAPC Table for Effect of Relative Solved Puzzles Across Paradigms,1109,447,87,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,71,70,40,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1012,453)| 10,72,SP Solved Puzzles,1180,620,36,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,73,72,68,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1137,579)| 10,74,SPSND Solved Puzzles for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm,1259,548,82,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,75,74,68,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1169,534)| 10,76,NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,1377,492,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,77,76,74,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1324,517)| 10,78,SPSNDV Solved Puzzles from Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,1334,619,78,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,79,78,74,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1301,588)| 10,80,SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,1468,553,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,81,80,76,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1428,526)| 10,82,P Practitioners,1635,515,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,83,82,80,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1574,528)| 10,84,PNDMAX Practitioners in Largest Nondominant Paradigm,1529,629,77,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,85,84,80,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1502,596)| 10,86,PND Practitioners in Nondominant Paradigm,1685,584,71,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,87,86,84,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1624,601)| 1,88,82,86,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1652,540)| 10,89,SINDP Switch for Historically NonDominant Paradigms,1798,597,77,24,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,90,89,86,0,0,0,0,0,128,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1745,591)| 1,91,80,78,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1407,583)| 1,92,72,78,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1229,619)| 10,93,RSP Relative Solved Puzzles,883,514,47,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,94,93,36,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(838,452)| 10,95,TEPC Table for Effect of Confidence on Progress,785,473,48,25,8,131,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,96,95,36,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(782,428)| 10,97,EGSP Expected Growth in Solved Puzzles,999,608,52,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,98,97,93,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(941,561)| 10,99,HSP Historical Solved Puzzles,962,653,52,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,100,99,93,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(925,589)| 1,101,72,93,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1042,571)| 10,102,TEHSP Time to Establish Historical Solved Puzzles,843,573,59,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,103,102,93,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(861,545)| 10,104,A Anomalies,276,342,47,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,105,104,46,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(325,358)| 10,106,AD Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm,257,399,60,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,107,106,46,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(332,395)| 10,108,DFA Discount for Anomalies,260,448,53,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,109,108,46,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(327,424)| 10,110,A Anomalies,288,603,47,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,111,110,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(350,577)| 10,112,ASND Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigm,430,610,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,113,112,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(442,578)| 10,114,SUM ASNDV,357,675,41,9,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,115,114,112,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(379,654)| 10,116,NOSNDP Number of Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,478,691,72,24,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,117,116,112,0,0,0,0,0,128,0,-1--1--1,,1|(457,656)| 10,118,ASNDV Anomalies for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,305,735,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,119,118,114,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(332,702)| 1,120,110,118,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(294,654)| 10,121,SISND Switch for Strongest Nondominant Paradigms,478,755,72,24,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,122,121,118,0,0,0,0,0,128,0,-1--1--1,,1|(398,745)| 10,123,ADV Anomalies in Dominant Paradigm,136,355,65,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,124,123,106,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(189,374)| 10,125,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,140,441,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,126,125,106,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(191,422)| 10,127,DFSP Discount for Solved Puzzles,603,829,57,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,128,127,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(635,771)| 10,129,SP Solved Puzzles,589,762,36,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,130,129,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(623,736)| 10,131,SPD Solved Puzzles in Dominant Paradigm,715,774,68,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,132,131,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(702,744)| 10,133,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,723,840,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,134,133,131,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(720,813)| 10,135,SPDV Solved Puzzles in Paradigms,885,809,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,136,135,131,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(807,793)| 10,137,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,1078,798,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,138,137,135,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(987,802)| 10,139,SP Solved Puzzles,1027,844,36,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,140,139,135,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(976,832)| 10,141,ICPE Initial Confidence in Emerging Paradigm,1282,44,74,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,142,141,15,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1196,43)| 12,143,0,1306,189,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,144,0,1410,231,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,145,0,1521,181,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,146,0,1510,310,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,147,0,1371,335,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *Puzzles $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,5,0 10,1,A Anomalies,866,253,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,2,IA Initial Anomalies,866,188,39,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,3,2,1,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(866,213)| 1,4,8,1,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(778,248)| 1,5,8,23,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(640,248)| 1,6,10,45,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1091,244)| 1,7,10,1,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(949,244)| 11,8,2172,725,248,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,9,ARECR Anomaly Recognition Rate,725,272,53,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 11,10,1948,999,244,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,11,ARESR Anomaly Resolution Rate,999,268,53,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,12,EPSR Expected Puzzle Solving Rate,621,159,61,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,13,12,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(674,204)| 10,14,FPRA Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies,771,163,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,15,14,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(746,208)| 10,16,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,765,356,64,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,17,16,9,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(747,318)| 10,18,ADA Average Difficulty of Anomalies,1112,152,68,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,19,18,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1053,199)| 10,20,PAR Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,954,151,70,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,21,20,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(976,197)| 1,22,16,11,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(878,312)| 10,23,PUA Puzzles Under Attack,521,253,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,24,DPUA Desired Puzzles Under Attack,161,524,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,25,24,23,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(332,394)| 12,26,48,266,251,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,27,29,23,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(431,249)| 1,28,29,26,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(323,249)| 11,29,48,376,249,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,30,"PIAR Puzzle Initiation & Abandonment Rate",376,273,67,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,31,33,45,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(522,463)| 1,32,33,23,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(522,309)| 11,33,1932,522,352,8,6,33,3,0,0,4,0,0,0 10,34,PSR Puzzle Solving Rate,569,352,39,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,35,ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles,654,415,67,19,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,36,35,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(615,386)| 10,37,PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,429,450,62,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,38,37,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(492,405)| 1,39,16,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(661,353)| 10,40,CPUA Correction for Puzzles Under Attack,160,288,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,41,40,30,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(261,281)| 1,42,16,30,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(579,316)| 1,43,8,29,1,0,0,0,0,64,0,-1--1--1,,1|(528,196)| 1,44,33,30,1,0,0,0,0,64,0,-1--1--1,,1|(443,329)| 10,45,SP Solved Puzzles,1091,463,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,46,ISP Initial Solved Puzzles,1158,515,52,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,47,46,45,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1132,495)| 10,48,ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles,1202,319,60,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,49,48,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1160,241)| 10,50,RDA Relative Difficulty of Anomalies,1273,91,68,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,51,50,18,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1199,119)| 10,52,FPPS Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,404,529,69,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,53,52,37,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(414,492)| 10,54,P Practitioners,544,533,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,55,54,37,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(497,499)| 10,56,DFPPS Desired Fraction of Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,497,626,77,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,57,56,52,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(455,582)| 10,58,EUPPS Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving,295,457,64,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,59,58,52,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(343,489)| 10,60,FPAR Fraction of Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,746,615,75,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,61,60,56,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(629,619)| 10,62,FPPSR Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research,730,684,77,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,63,62,56,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(620,656)| 1,64,24,58,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(213,497)| 1,65,23,58,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(415,348)| 10,66,TEUPPS Table for Effect of Unsolved Puzzles on Solving,211,390,75,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,67,66,58,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(247,419)| 10,68,CP Confidence in Paradigm,924,618,57,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,69,68,62,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(845,644)| 10,70,TFPPSR Table for Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm Sanctioned Research,956,681,89,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,71,70,62,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(844,682)| 10,72,EAPAR Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,755,553,85,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,73,72,60,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(751,577)| 1,74,62,60,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(735,656)| 10,75,WPEAR Willingness to Enter Anomaly Resolution,927,564,71,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,76,75,60,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(845,586)| 10,77,RA Relative Anomalies,860,497,36,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,78,77,72,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(821,517)| 10,79,TEAPAR Table for Effect of Anomalies on Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,629,492,90,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,80,79,72,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(685,519)| 1,81,1,77,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(863,370)| 10,82,AA Acceptable Anomalies,1002,510,46,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,83,82,77,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(932,503)| 10,84,ADP Average Difficulty of Puzzles,725,92,65,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,85,84,14,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(741,117)| 10,86,DPAR Difficulty of Puzzles for Anomaly Resolution,541,102,64,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,87,86,14,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(645,128)| 10,88,TFPRA Table for Fraction of Puzzles Recognized as Anomalies,808,40,84,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,89,88,14,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(791,94)| 10,90,ECART Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution,392,38,72,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,91,90,86,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(459,67)| 10,92,NDPAR Normal Difficulty for Anomaly Resolution,393,131,65,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,93,92,86,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(460,118)| 10,94,CP Confidence in Paradigm,247,102,57,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,95,94,90,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(303,76)| 10,96,TECART Table for Effect of Confidence on Anomaly Resolution,194,35,81,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,97,96,90,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(290,36)| 1,98,86,12,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(580,130)| 1,99,37,12,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(520,310)| 10,100,ED Elasticity of Difficulty wrt Solved Puzzles,1286,210,59,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,101,100,48,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1245,262)| 10,102,NDP Noral Difficulty of Puzzles,1413,229,60,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,103,102,48,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1313,271)| 10,104,NSP Normal Solved Puzzles,1369,286,47,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,105,104,48,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1298,299)| 1,106,45,48,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1143,394)| 1,107,56,24,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(323,573)| 10,108,NPP Normal Puzzles per Practitioner,118,581,43,24,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,109,108,24,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(137,554)| 10,110,P Practitioners,233,581,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,111,110,24,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(207,560)| 1,112,24,40,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(104,415)| 1,113,23,40,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(359,326)| 10,114,TAPUA Time to Adjust Puzzles Under Attack,155,216,73,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,115,114,40,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(156,245)| 12,116,0,1274,427,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,117,0,1378,469,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,118,0,1489,419,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,119,0,1478,548,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,120,0,1339,573,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting 10,121,MSAP Maximum Strength of Paradigms,1369,318,72,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,122,121,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| 10,123,NSPA Normal Solved Puzzles,1369,318,52,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,124,123,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| 10,125,NSPD Normal Solved Puzzles for Paradigm 1,1369,318,75,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,126,125,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| 10,127,SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives,1369,318,67,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,128,127,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| 10,129,SSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Strength,1369,318,73,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,130,129,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| 10,131,VSAP Variance in Strength of Paradigms,1369,318,72,16,8,2,1,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 1,132,131,104,0,1,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1369,302)| \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *Accounting $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,5,0 10,1,X Next Paradigm Launch Switch,1299,285,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,2,TIME STEP,1361,365,44,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,3,2,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1338,335)| 10,4,CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm,982,305,65,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,5,4,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1068,305)| 10,6,CPTHRESH Confidence Threshold for Deterministic Paradigm Launch,869,356,81,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,7,6,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1019,331)| 10,8,MNAP Maximum Nmber of Active Paradigms for Deterministic Launch,1010,391,82,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,9,8,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1090,348)| 10,10,PA Probability of Activation,1042,439,52,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,11,10,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1100,378)| 10,12,RND Random Number,1309,409,42,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,13,12,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1245,362)| 10,14,SIAP Switch for Active Paradigms,1264,466,64,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,15,14,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1220,392)| 10,16,SPA Switch for Probabilistic Activation,1165,432,69,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,17,16,23,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1166,376)| 1,18,1,23,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1244,322)| 12,19,48,1072,290,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,20,22,1,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1217,290)| 1,21,22,19,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1123,290)| 11,22,48,1170,290,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,23,CX Increment for Next Paradigm Switch,1170,307,67,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,24,Init X,1297,220,24,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,25,24,1,0,0,0,0,0,64,1,-1--1--1,,1|(1297,240)| 10,26,CE Cumulative Effort,487,315,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 12,27,48,217,316,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,28,30,26,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(394,317)| 1,29,30,27,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(278,317)| 11,30,48,336,317,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,31,DCE Change in Cumulative Effort,336,341,52,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,32,P Practitioners,264,397,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,33,32,31,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(289,376)| 10,34,HDP Historically Dominant Paradigms,491,451,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,35,TIME STEP,494,552,44,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,36,35,34,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(492,513)| 12,37,48,218,450,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,38,40,34,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(397,447)| 1,39,40,37,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(280,447)| 11,40,48,338,447,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,41,CHDP Increment to Historically Dominant Paradigms,338,479,65,24,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,42,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,254,537,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,43,42,41,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(284,515)| 10,44,HSP Historical Solved Puzzles,871,447,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,45,SP Solved Puzzles,660,521,36,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,46,45,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(691,482)| 10,47,TEHSP Time to Establish Historical Solved Puzzles,750,526,59,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,48,47,50,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(735,483)| 12,49,48,605,446,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 11,50,48,723,446,6,8,2,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 1,51,50,44,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(780,446)| 1,52,50,49,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(666,446)| 1,53,44,50,1,0,0,0,0,64,0,-1--1--1,,1|(802,482)| 10,54,TOA Time of Paradigm Activation,825,169,40,20,3,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,55,TIME STEP,827,253,44,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,56,55,54,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(826,223)| 12,57,48,586,167,10,8,0,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,58,60,54,4,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(740,168)| 1,59,60,57,100,0,0,22,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(640,168)| 11,60,48,690,168,6,8,34,3,0,0,1,0,0,0 10,61,DTOA Increment in Activation Time,690,192,58,16,40,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,62,NPINP Practitioners in New Paradigm,676,291,61,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,63,62,61,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(681,248)| 10,64,RINP Recruitment into New Paradigms,608,251,66,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,65,64,61,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(642,225)| 10,66,Time,735,253,24,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,67,66,61,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(719,231)| 1,68,55,61,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(772,228)| 10,69,DFPA Discount for Activation,979,513,57,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,70,69,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1005,481)| 10,71,PCNP Probability for Creating New Paradigm,1058,553,72,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,72,71,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1051,502)| 10,73,TIME STEP,1119,518,44,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,74,73,10,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1088,486)| 10,75,LSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Launch,1423,462,68,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,76,75,12,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1372,438)| 10,77,MSPDL Minimum Size for Deterministic Launch,1233,562,74,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,78,77,14,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1245,520)| 10,79,P Practitioners,1367,552,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,80,79,14,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1325,516)| 10,81,PARD Dominant Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,907,598,75,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,82,81,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(986,574)| 10,83,PDP Practitioners in Dominant Paradigm,1005,643,62,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,84,83,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1027,604)| 10,85,PPCAR Probability of Creation from Anomaly Resolution,1325,611,70,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,86,85,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1199,583)| 10,87,PPCOA Probability of Creation from Other Activity,1306,663,66,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,88,87,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1179,606)| 10,89,PPCPS Probability of Creation from Solving,1321,707,66,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,90,89,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1195,633)| 10,91,PPSD Dominant Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,1172,672,69,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,92,91,71,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1116,613)| 10,93,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,736,644,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,94,93,81,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(806,624)| 10,95,PARV Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,853,656,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,96,95,81,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(870,636)| 10,97,PAR Practitioners in Anomaly Resolution,872,724,67,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,98,97,95,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(864,696)| 10,99,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,741,731,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,100,99,95,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(790,697)| 10,101,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,1080,729,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,102,101,83,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1047,691)| 10,103,PDPV Dominant Practitioners,979,725,50,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,104,103,83,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(989,690)| 10,105,P Practitioners,1052,782,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,106,105,103,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1025,761)| 10,107,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,945,793,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,108,107,103,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(958,765)| 10,109,NODP Number of Dominant Paradigms,1322,745,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,110,109,91,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1261,715)| 10,111,PPSV Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,1193,735,60,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,112,111,91,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1186,714)| 10,113,PPS Practitioners in Puzzle Solving,1338,800,59,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,114,113,111,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1271,770)| 10,115,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,1197,806,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,116,115,111,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1195,777)| 10,117,FPCP Fraction of Practitioners in Paradigm,321,634,53,24,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,118,P Practitioners,195,666,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,119,118,117,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(242,653)| 10,120,TP Total Practitioners,191,612,43,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,121,120,117,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(244,620)| 10,122,SAP Switch to Activate Paradigm,1454,279,56,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 10,123,MSPA Minimum Strength for Activation,1435,199,67,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,124,123,122,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1442,232)| 10,125,P Practitioners,1554,217,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 1,126,125,122,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1515,240)| 10,127,SARL Switch for Random Launch,1549,320,50,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,128,127,122,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1507,302)| 10,129,TSAP Switch for Fixed Launch Times,1476,360,62,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,130,129,122,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1466,326)| 1,131,1,122,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1361,282)| 10,132,ZDUMTOA Fixed Launch Times,1523,426,52,16,8,3,0,0,-1,0,0,0 1,133,132,129,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,-1--1--1,,1|(1503,398)| 10,134,MSAP Maximum Strength of Paradigms,247,775,72,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,135,NSPA Normal Solved Puzzles,398,714,52,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,136,NSPD Normal Solved Puzzles for Paradigm 1,239,714,75,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,137,SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives,395,837,67,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,138,SSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Strength,242,892,73,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,139,VSAP Variance in Strength of Paradigms,245,840,72,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 12,140,0,250,78,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,141,0,354,120,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,142,0,465,70,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,143,0,454,199,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,144,0,315,224,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting \\\---/// Sketch information - do not modify anything except names V300 Do not put anything below this section - it will be ignored *Control $192-192-192,0,Arial|10||0-0-0|0-0-0|0-0-255|-1--1--1|-1--1--1|96,96,100,0 12,1,0,275,217,239,175,3,188,0,0,1,0,0,0 Practitioners 12,2,0,760,217,239,175,3,188,0,0,2,0,0,0 CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm,Graph 10,3,P Practitioners,281,410,53,9,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,4,CDP Confidence in Dominant Paradigm,766,408,65,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 12,5,0,275,602,239,175,3,188,0,0,1,0,0,0 Solved_Puzzles 12,6,0,760,602,239,175,3,188,0,0,2,0,0,0 SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,Gantt 10,7,SP Solved Puzzles,280,802,36,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,8,LSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Launch,1119,63,72,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,9,SSEED Random Seed for Paradigm Strength,1120,107,73,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,10,SAIA Switch for Identical Alternatives,1232,108,67,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|10||128-128-128 10,11,SIDP Switch for Dominant Paradigms,763,797,68,16,8,2,0,3,-1,0,0,0,128-128-128,0-0-0,|0||128-128-128 12,12,0,1080,204,32,32,6,135,0,5,-1,0,6,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Control 12,13,0,1184,246,44,44,6,135,0,5,-1,0,2,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Practitioners 12,14,0,1295,196,40,40,6,135,0,5,-1,0,3,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Confidence 12,15,0,1284,325,38,38,6,135,0,5,-1,0,4,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Puzzles 12,16,0,1145,350,41,41,6,135,0,5,-1,0,5,0,160-160-160,192-192-192,|0||0-0-0 Accounting ///---\\\ :GRAPH Practitioners :TITLE Practitioners :NO-LEGEND 1 :SCALE :VAR P Practitioners[PM] :GRAPH Solved_Puzzles :TITLE Solved Puzzles :NO-LEGEND 1 :SCALE :VAR SP Solved Puzzles[PM] :L<%^E!@ 1:scirev8.vdf 9:scirev8 22:$,Dollar,Dollars,$s 22:Day,Days 22:Hour,Hours 22:Month,Months 22:Person,People,Persons 22:Puzzle,Puzzles 22:Unit,Units 22:Week,Weeks 22:Year,Years 15:0,0,0,0,0,0 19:100,0 27:2, 34:0, 4:Time 5:A Anomalies[PM] 35:Date 36:YYYY-MM-DD 37:2000 38:1 39:1 40:2 41:0 42:0 24:0 25:2000 26:2000 6:n1 6:n10 6:n11 6:n12 6:n13 6:n14 6:n15 6:n16 6:n17 6:n18 6:n19 6:n2 6:n20 6:n21 6:n22 6:n23 6:n24 6:n25 6:n3 6:n4 6:n5 6:n6 6:n7 6:n8 6:n9